<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rumors are rumbling:  Who&#8217;s up now?  VMware and Intel?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://c1tr1xguru.wordpress.com/2008/05/17/rumors-are-rumbling-whos-up-now-vmware-and-intel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://c1tr1xguru.wordpress.com/2008/05/17/rumors-are-rumbling-whos-up-now-vmware-and-intel/</link>
	<description>Viewpoints on Business, Innovation, Strategy, and of course Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 18:59:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: inadvisability</title>
		<link>http://c1tr1xguru.wordpress.com/2008/05/17/rumors-are-rumbling-whos-up-now-vmware-and-intel/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>inadvisability</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 17:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://c1tr1xguru.wordpress.com/?p=118#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Inadvisability says : I absolutely agree with this !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inadvisability says : I absolutely agree with this !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Clark</title>
		<link>http://c1tr1xguru.wordpress.com/2008/05/17/rumors-are-rumbling-whos-up-now-vmware-and-intel/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 04:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://c1tr1xguru.wordpress.com/?p=118#comment-23</guid>
		<description>This would be bad news for AMD.  Right now AMD is the darling of virtualization performance and Intel is going to compete the best way it knows how: dirty.  Rather than compete in the arena of ideas and innovation, Intel will use non-technical means (acquisition) to gain/protect market share.  Boo Intel!

Readers who think I&#039;m insane now will need to read Alessandro&#039;s post.  He mentions possible buyers as Intel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This would be bad news for AMD.  Right now AMD is the darling of virtualization performance and Intel is going to compete the best way it knows how: dirty.  Rather than compete in the arena of ideas and innovation, Intel will use non-technical means (acquisition) to gain/protect market share.  Boo Intel!</p>
<p>Readers who think I&#8217;m insane now will need to read Alessandro&#8217;s post.  He mentions possible buyers as Intel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
